This week I was asked about a person in their early 60s who has retired from the work force.

Briefly, they have roughly $500,000 in super and still have an outstanding mortgage of just over $300,000 on their home.

The question was – should they use their super to pay off their outstanding home loan or should they retain their home loan, with its modest interest rate so as to have the potential to earn a higher return on their super?

From a purely financial perspective, if the return on the invested funds is greater, after tax and charges, than the interest they are paying on their mortgage, then it’s better to retain the mortgage and use the money to generate investment returns, which can be used to service the debt. Provided the return on the investment over the longer term is greater than the interest on the loan, they will be ahead.

However, what if the person mentioned is stressed by the outstanding debt on their home, particularly as they have retired? After all, they still need to find the money to make their home loan repayments each month, and there is no guarantee that interest rates will remain where they are, or the return on their super will continue at its current rate.

If the debt is causing stress or anxiety, there is a strong argument to pay off the loan, even though they will no longer have the funds available for investment. In this situation, it is not so much a financial question, but rather, one that addresses the individual’s mental and physical health and well-being.

To fully provide appropriate advice that is truly in the best interests of the person asking the question, we need to go further.

We need to gain a clear understanding of a few things including, but not limited to:

1. What are the person’s assets and liabilities?
What do they own? What is it worth? How much do they owe others – in addition to their home loan do they have car loans, personal loans, and credit cards?

2. How much income do they need?
Do they have an up-to-date budget that identifies their current expenditure?

3. Where is their current income coming from?
Are they drawing down on their super, receiving government income support benefits such as Jobseeker or a disability support pension? Will they qualify for the age pension in the future, or do they have income from other sources such as trusts and other investments? Is their income likely to change in the future?

4. As this person lives in a major capital city their home is likely to be quite valuable.
Are they willing to consider accessing some of the equity in their home to generate additional income?
While they have the option of a reverse mortgage or other form of equity release product, a simpler approach may be to sell their home and downsize. However, people are often emotionally attached to their home and what may seem to be a reasonable and rational decision may not be all that easy to get across the line.

5. What are their longer-term goals?
What do they see a typical day in their retirement looking like?
Where will they live? How will they spend their time? What type of car will they drive? Where will they dine, and travel to?

6. How is their health?
Are they in good health or do they have ongoing health concerns that may impact on their longevity?

7. Do they plan to leave a legacy?
Are they happy to run down their savings over their retirement years or do they plan to preserve their capital so they can pass it on to future generations?

When planning for retirement, the financial aspects will play a key role. However, it is not just about the money.

Retirement planning is about living a life that is fulfilling and rewarding from a physical, mental, spiritual, and financial perspective.

Remember however, making financial decisions and planning for key life events such as retirement require time and careful consideration. With that in mind, seeking advice from an appropriately qualified financial planner is highly recommended.

 

Source: Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance